Last proposal for LNG terminal in Maine set aside by federal regulators
Portland Press Herald, September 12, 2016 https://www.pressherald.com/2016/09/12/maines-final-lng-proposal-tossed-by-federal-regulators/
Exporting U.S. natural gas isn’t as “clean” as you think
Washington Post June 9, 2014 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/06/09/exporting-u-s-natural-gas-isnt-as-clean-as-you-think/
“One of the rallying cries in favor of liquefying and exporting U.S. natural gas has been to help reduce greenhouse gases in other countries, by crowding out coal in Asia and Europe.
Yet tucked into an Energy Department report on LNG exports is a different view: That U.S. exports of LNG to China could end up being worse from a greenhouse gas perspective than if China simply built a new power plant and burned its own coal supplies. The report also says that the climate benefits of exporting LNG to other countries are modest.”
“‘The process of liquefaction, transport, and regasification of LNG is highly emissions-intensive, increasing by 15 percent the total life cycle GHG emissions associated with exported U.S. natural gas,’ James Bradbury, senior associate of the climate and energy program at the World Resources Institute, said in congressional testimony on May 7, 2013. ‘These added upstream emissions also significantly reduce the relative advantage that natural gas would have over higher-emitting fuels, like coal and oil.’”
Energy Department Bombshell: LNG Has No Climate Benefit For Decades, IF EVER*
*If one uses estimates for methane leakage based on actual observations
By Joe Romm on June 4, 2014 https://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/06/04/3443211/energy-department-lng-no-climate-benefits/
"To make LNG a climate winner, you’d have to assume levels of methane leakage that are a factor of 2 to 3 lower than what recent observations reveal. That is exactly what DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) does in its analysis, 'Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Perspective on Exporting Liquefied Natural Gas from the United States.'”
"For DOE, 1.6 percent leakage is the highest leakage rate they considered!! And 1.4% is what they expect for shale gas.
In fact, leakage rates are almost certainly at least double that! Yes, the EPA has lowered its estimate to about 1.5 percent — based solely on industry-provided numbers. But multiple studies in the last two years based on actual observations have made clear the EPA was simply wrong.
Back in November, fifteen scientists from some of the leading institutions in the world — including Harvard, NOAA and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab — published a seminal observation-based study, 'Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States.' The authors took the unusual step of explicitly criticizing the EPA: 'The US EPA recently decreased its CH4 emission factors for fossil fuel extraction and processing by 25–30% (for 1990–2011), but we find that CH4 data from across North America instead indicate the need for a larger adjustment of the opposite sign.'”
The flying debris pierced the double walls of a 134-foot LNG tank on site, causing leaks. Five workers were injured, and local responders warned that vapors from the leaks could trigger a more devastating, second explosion. A county fire department spokesman said authorities were concerned a second blast could level a 0.75 mile 'lethal zone' around the plant.
Everyone within a two-mile radius of the site was evacuated...”
July 26, 2013 Halliburton has agreed to plead guilty to destroying evidence WASHINGTON L.A. Times "Oil-field services giant Halliburton has agreed to plead guilty to destroying evidence in connection with the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the Justice Department announced Thursday."
"The April 2010 explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig was the largest offshore oil disaster in U.S. history, killing 11 workers and spewing nearly 5 million barrels of oil into the gulf. The Macondo well was owned by a consortium of energy companies, led by BP. Transocean owned the drilling rig that BP was leasing for the venture. Halliburton was contracted by BP to do the cement work on the well.
The plea agreement was the third that the Justice Department has obtained in the criminal investigation of the disaster. Transocean agreed to pay $400 million as part of its criminal plea, and BP, $4 billion. A civil suit against the three companies brought by the Justice Department and others is continuing."
July 16, 2013 Activists: LNG port could open door to fracking Red Bank Hub Despite the contentions of Liberty Natural Gas (LNG) and federal officials from the Maritime Administration (MARAD) and the U.S. Coast Guard…
Sandia
Report of 7 Mile LNG Vapor Cloud
Fall River Hess LNG terminal plan officially terminated, says FERC ... The Herald
NJ governor vetoes liquefied natural gas operation Bloomberg
AP NewsBreak: Alaska LNG plant closing Houston Chronicle
Save The Bay Takes Hess LNG Fight to the "Street" MarketWatch
Bill To Ban LNG Stations Off NJ Coast Clears Committee NJ TODAY
Bill's add-on would bar Fall River LNG project Boston Herald
Investigation continues in Mass. LNG gas plant blast Boston Herald
Sen. Brown opposes Fall River LNG terminal NECN
Developer Halts Work On Bradwood Landing Oregon LNG Terminal Wall Street Journal
Oregon LNG port developer files for liquidation - The Associated Press
New Jersey governor rejects liquid natural gas island liherald.com
Feds pull plug on tribe's LNG pact Bangor Daily News
Govt plans to 'subsidise' imported
LNG
Natural Gas Glut A Problem For LNG Projects Ninemsn
Judge Investigating Claims Of Misconduct By
LNG Companies
FERC sets meetings on Oregon
LNG complaints
Not Everyone's A Winner In LNG
Markets
Mayor objects to Maine LNG terminals Telegraph-Journal
Danger at our doorstep
EDITORIAL: Why Worry If the Energy Industry Says LNG is Safe?